Skip to content

Planning

Planning permission for a riding arena

Almost every new riding arena needs planning permission. That sounds worse than it is: most applications for a well sited arena on land already in equestrian use are approved. What causes refusals is rarely the arena itself.

Do you need permission?

In most cases yes. A riding arena involves engineering operations and a material change in the use and appearance of land, and neither is generally covered by permitted development rights for a private householder.

There are exceptions worth knowing about. Agricultural permitted development can sometimes cover works on a genuine agricultural holding, but an arena for private riding is not an agricultural use, and relying on this without checking is a common and expensive mistake. If the land has never had an established equestrian use, you may be applying for a change of use as well as for the arena.

The reliable answer is a pre application enquiry with your local planning authority. It costs a modest fee, it gets you an officer's initial view in writing, and it is far cheaper than a refusal.

What planners actually object to

Officers are rarely troubled by a flat sand surface in a field. The objections cluster around a short and predictable list, and knowing it in advance changes how an application is put together.

  • Lighting. Floodlights are the single most common cause of difficulty, particularly in a designated landscape or anywhere with dark skies policy. Consider whether you need them, and if so apply for them explicitly with a lighting design rather than adding them later.
  • Landscape impact. How the arena reads in a wider view: cut and fill on a slope, the height of fencing on a skyline, and whether existing hedges screen it.
  • Siting relative to neighbours. Noise, dust and hours of use, particularly if there is any suggestion of commercial activity.
  • Access and traffic. Fine for private use. A different question entirely if the application looks like a business.
  • Surface water drainage. Where the water goes, and whether it increases flood risk elsewhere.

Designated landscapes

Large parts of our area sit inside a National Landscape (formerly an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty) or a National Park. The Kent Downs, the Surrey Hills and the High Weald are National Landscapes. The South Downs is a National Park and is its own planning authority.

Inside these designations the test is stricter and the emphasis falls on conserving the landscape character. That does not mean an arena is refused. It means siting, levels, materials, fencing colour and lighting all carry more weight, and an application that has clearly thought about them does considerably better than one that has not.

In practice the arenas that get approved in these areas are the ones set into the ground rather than perched on it, screened by existing planting rather than proposed planting, and either unlit or lit to a genuine design.

Biodiversity Net Gain

Since 2024, most planning permissions in England carry a mandatory Biodiversity Net Gain requirement: development must leave biodiversity measurably better than it found it, by at least ten percent, secured for thirty years.

There are exemptions, and many small private arena applications will fall under one of them, particularly where the works affect below the de minimis threshold of habitat. But it is no longer safe to assume it does not apply, and where it does it means a habitat assessment and a plan for delivering the gain.

This is the most significant recent change in this area and it is the thing most likely to be missed by someone applying on their own. It is worth establishing early whether you are exempt, because the answer changes the cost and the timetable.

What an application involves

A householder or full application for an arena typically needs a location plan, a site plan showing the arena and its levels, cross sections where there is cut and fill, a drainage strategy, and a design and access statement explaining the siting.

Where there is lighting, add a lighting design with predicted light spill. Where the land is not already in equestrian use, add the change of use. Where a designation applies, add a landscape and visual appraisal proportionate to the site.

Determination is usually eight weeks from validation, though validation itself can take a fortnight if the submission is incomplete. Build a realistic three to four months into your thinking from first enquiry to a decision.

How we help

We can handle the application end to end: measured survey, drawings, drainage strategy, statements, submission and correspondence with the case officer. That is priced as its own line on our pricing page rather than buried in a build cost, and it is deducted from the build price if the application is approved and you go ahead with us.

We are equally happy to work alongside an agent you already use, or to supply only the technical drawings and drainage strategy for someone else's application.

One thing we will not do is tell you an application is a formality. Occasionally we look at a site and think permission is genuinely unlikely, and it is better to hear that before you have spent anything.

This page describes how the planning system generally works for riding arenas in England. It is not advice on your site. Every application turns on its own facts and on local policy, so treat this as orientation and get a view on your own land before committing.

Chat to Harriet